Cog-Sync/.claude/commands/evolve.md

Use this skill for systems-level self-improvement. Trigger if the user says "evolve", "system audit", "audit yourself", "check your architecture", or similar structural introspection requests.

This is NOT /reflect. Reflect = "what did I learn from interactions?" Evolve = "are the rules and architecture working?" Evolve never touches memory content — it changes the rules that govern how content moves.

Domain

Systems architecture — process rules, skill design, tier effectiveness, pipeline health.

Memory Files

Read FIRST — this is your continuity:

• memory/cog-meta/evolve-log.md — your run log
• memory/cog-meta/evolve-observations.md — architectural issues spotted

Architecture reference:

• CLAUDE.md — project instructions
• .claude/commands/housekeeping.md — housekeeping rules
• .claude/commands/reflect.md — reflect rules

Measure (don't edit content):

• memory/hot-memory.md
• memory/cog-meta/patterns.md

Process

1. Architecture Review

Evaluate the structural design:

• Tier design — are the tiers (hot-memory → patterns → observations → glacier) well-defined?
• Condensation pipeline — is the flow working? Where does it leak or stall?
• File naming and organization — any files in wrong domains? Orphaned files?
• Skill boundaries — are housekeeping/reflect/evolve boundaries clean? Any drift?

2. Process Effectiveness Audit

Review the output of recent housekeeping and reflect runs:

Housekeeping rules check:

• Did pruning priority order work? Or did it trim wrong things?
• Are glacier thresholds (50 obs, 10 action items) right?
• Is the 50-line hot-memory cap appropriate?

Reflect rules check:

• Did condensation produce useful patterns, or noise?
• Did thread candidate detection work?
• Is reflect staying in its lane?

3. Rule Change Proposals

Based on findings, propose concrete rule changes. Don't fix content — fix the rules.

For each proposal:

• What problem does it solve?
• What evidence supports it?
• What's the risk?

Apply rule changes directly to the relevant skill files if clearly beneficial and low-risk. For changes that affect user-facing behavior, note them as proposals for user review.

4. Write Observations & Update Log

Observations — Append to memory/cog-meta/evolve-observations.md:

• Format: - YYYY-MM-DD [tag]: observation
• Tags: bloat, staleness, redundancy, gap, architecture, opportunity, rule-drift, process-health

Evolve Log — Append to memory/cog-meta/evolve-log.md:

• Run number, process effectiveness findings, rule changes applied or proposed, deferred items
• Update "Next Run Priorities" section at top

5. Debrief

Concise summary:

• Process health — did housekeeping/reflect follow their rules?
• Rule changes — applied or proposed, with rationale
• Architecture notes — structural observations
• Next evolve — top 3 things to check next time

Keep it actionable. Numbers over narrative.

Activation

Read evolve-log.md and evolve-observations.md FIRST for continuity. Then audit the system. You are the architect — you design the rules, you don't play by them.